ABP

Case studies

Intelligence Is Interesting. Outcomes Matter More.

Every case study here uses genuine, client-approved information. We publish the problem, the systems we built and the measured before and after state — and nothing we cannot evidence.

How a case study is made

Measured, Then Approved.

We baseline before anything is implemented, so the after state has something honest to be compared against. Nothing is published until the client signs off on the numbers.

Where the work sits in a documented engagement

  • Baseline & instrumentation25%
  • Implementation of the AI systems45%
  • Measurement, review & approval30%
01Baseline02Implement03Measure04Approve05PublishCOMPOUNDINGLOOP
Figure 01 — the evidence loop behind every published outcome.

Anatomy of an ABP case study

What You’ll Read.

Problem

The commercial constraint the business was actually living with.

Opportunity

Where intelligence could change the economics, not just the workflow.

Strategy

The decision we made, and the decisions we deliberately did not make.

AI systems

What was implemented, how it was governed, who owned it.

Before & after

The measured state on both sides, recorded with the client.

Metrics

Client-verified numbers only. Nothing modelled, nothing illustrative.

Engagement 001 — worked example

A Perth Home Services Group.

Worked engagement model — built from the ABP Method, not a client-verified result

The business

A multi-trade home services group operating across metropolitan Perth, with five service lines competing for the same marketing budget and no shared view of which one was actually growing.

The problem

Enquiries arrived through four disconnected channels. Quotes were followed up by hand, often days late, and the highest-value jobs were the ones most likely to go cold.

The opportunity

The demand already existed. The constraint was response speed and attribution — knowing which signal produced revenue, not just which produced clicks.

The systems

Search and answer-engine coverage rebuilt around service intent, advertising consolidated to measured intent, automated quote follow-up within minutes, and a single conversion record every service line could see.

The governance

One human owner per signal, weekly review of the five SCIG scores, and no automated action allowed to contact a customer without an approved template behind it.

Before and after — month 0 vs month 12

  • Qualified enquiries per month

    Before48
    After126
  • Average first response time

    Before9h 20m
    After4m
  • Quote-to-job conversion

    Before18%
    After31%
  • Cost per booked job

    BeforeA$310
    AfterA$146
Figure 02 — modelled twelve-month movement across four measured signals.

These figures illustrate how the five SCIG signals compound across a year of work. They are a model of the method, not the record of a client engagement — real client numbers are published only once measured and approved.

Currently in preparation

No Invented Numbers.

The first client-verified ABP case studies are being written with the businesses involved, and go live once the results and quotes are formally approved.

We would rather show you an empty shelf than a fabricated result.

Client-verified data
Written with the client
Reviewed for accuracy
Formally approved
Published case study
Figure 03 — from approved evidence to a published editorial case study.

Start your own before state

Every Case Study Begins With A Baseline.

The AI Growth Audit is the measurement that opens an engagement. It scores your five signals today, so twelve months from now there is something honest to compare against.

AI Growth Audit
Signal baseline
Systems implemented
Measured at 12 months
Approved case study
Figure 04 — your audit becomes the baseline of a future case study.

In the meantime

See The Thinking.

The ABP Method explains exactly how an engagement runs, and our insights show the analysis behind the systems we build.